IMPROVE IVC PROCESS AND ENHANCE PUBLIC SAFETY. (NEW)

Printer-friendly: Click to view
View NCGA Bill Details2025-2026 Session
House Bill 1104 (Public) Filed Wednesday, April 29, 2026
AN ACT TO IMPROVE THE INVOLUNTARY COMMITMENT PROCESS AND INCREASE PUBLIC SAFETY AND TO IMPLEMENT AN INPATIENT CAPACITY RESTORATION PROGRAM.
Intro. by Reeder, Blackwell, Miller, Cotham.

Status: Re-ref Com On Rules and Operations of the Senate (Senate action) (Jun 23 2026)

SOG comments (2):

Long title change

House committee substitute to the 1st edition changes the act's long title. Previous title was AN ACT TO REQUIRE THE NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, THE NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, AND THE ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE OF THE COURTS TO STUDY AND RECOMMEND SYSTEMIC IMPROVEMENTS TO THE INVOLUNTARY COMMITMENT PROCESS, AS RECOMMENDED BY THE HOUSE SELECT COMMITTEE ON INVOLUNTARY COMMITMENT AND PUBLIC SAFETY.

Long title change

Senate committee substitute to the 3rd edition changes the act's long title. Previous title was AN ACT TO IMPROVE THE INVOLUNTARY COMMITMENT PROCESS AND INCREASE PUBLIC SAFETY.

Bill History:

H 1104

Bill Summaries:

  • Summary date: Jun 23 2026 - View Summary

    Senate committee substitute to the 3rd edition makes the following changes.  Makes conforming changes to act’s long title.

    Section 1.

    Changes the entity tasked with studying relevant statutes, judicial and clinical practices, and available technological resources to identify areas for systemic improvement in the involuntary commitment (IVC) process in the State from the team comprising the Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS), the Department of Information Technology (DIT), the Administrative Office of the Courts (AOC) to the NC Collaboratory (Collaboratory). Makes conforming changes. Requires a progress report to be submitted to the specified NCGA committee by December 1, 2026. With a final report due by March 1, 2027 (was, February 1, 2027). Now requires the study to develop proposed clinical workflows, transport guidance, and bench cards, as specified (was, just clinical workflows).

    Section 2.

    Removes provisions requiring DHHS and the North Carolina Sheriff’s Association (Association) to develop a plan for using telehealth to complete the first examinations of individuals in county jails. 

    Adds provisions requiring the Association to develop a proposal for a pilot program for the Association using telehealth to complete the first examinations of individuals in county jails, including jails willing to participate in the pilot program. Requires the Association to submit the proposal to the specified NCGA committees by March 1, 2027.

    Section 6.5 (was, Section 7).

    Modifies the scope of the task assigned to DHHS, the Association, and the NC Healthcare Association (new) so that these entities are now requires to study the listed matters related to the development of a Behavioral Health Statewide Central Availability Navigator Updates, instead of implementing the updates. Removes effective date and instead requires DHHS to submit a report to the specified NCGA committee by March 1, 2027. Renumbers the remaining sections accordingly. 

    Section 7.

    Now requires the Collaboratory to submit a progress report to the specified NCGA committees on its study of the differing legal standards governing involuntary commitment and incapacity to proceed to identify statutory revisions that would enhance each system's effectiveness and advance public safety for all individuals involved by December 1, 2026, with the final report now due on March 1, 2027.

    Section 8.

    Clarifies the scope of the study pertaining to the “revolving door” so that it also includes reporting on what has been examined and reported pursuant to SL 2025-27.

    Section 9.

    Changes the entity responsible for studying behavioral health care in jails from the Department of Adult Corrections and the Association to the Collaboratory. Includes the Association as one of the relevant stakeholders that should be consulted with as part of the study. Requires a progress report by December 1, 2026, with the final report due to the specified NCGA committee (was, committee and division) by March 1, 2027.

    Section 10.

    Requires the Collaboratory to seek the assistance of UNC Health in its study on the feasibility of improving the provision of services at Broughton Hospital, Central Regional Hospital, and Cherry Hospital (collectively, the Hospitals). Authorizes UNC Health to make recommendations for the final report. Requires a progress report by December 1, 2026, with the final report due to the specified NCGA by March 1, 2027.

    Section 11(b).

    Modifies the evaluation of a respondent’s history of declining or nonadherence to treatment prong of the evaluation under GS 122C-263 (under the provisions requiring a recommendation of outpatient commitment) so that it also has to include one of the now four enumerated repeated incarcerations, violations, or hospitalizations occurring in the relevant past (was, just a single incarceration, violation, or hospitalization, not repeated occurrences).

    Modifies the inpatient commitment order that is authorized under GS 122C-274 so that it must be issued upon finding by clear, cogent, and convincing evidence that the respondent is mentally ill and dangerous to himself, as defined in GS 122C-3(11)a., or others, as defined in GS 122C-3(11)b. Specifies that a finding of noncompliance with an outpatient commitment order creates a rebuttable presumption that the respondent is dangerous to himself, or others. (was, requires a nexus between the respondent's past conduct and the reasonable probability of the respondent's future dangerousness to self or others).

    Section 13.

    Adds the following new content.

    Specifies in GS 15A-532 that pretrial release of a defendant found incapable to proceed is governed by Article 26 (bail) of GS Chapter 15A along with Article 56 (incapacity to Proceed) of the Chapter.

    Amends GS 15A-1001 as follows. Makes conforming changes, including to the statute’s title. Makes technical changes. Declares the State’s policy that persons found to be incapable to proceed should be provided with capacity restoration services whenever feasible and appropriate and that such services should be carried out in as efficient and timely a manner as possible in order to meet the ends of justice for victims, for the public, and for those persons who stand accused of crimes. Lists three services that are considered capacity restoration services, on educational instruction on the criminal justice system, psychoeducational instruction, and other mental health services. Provides civil immunity for an individual, facility, agency, or entity, or officials, staff and employees of these individuals and entities, responsible for the custody, transportation. examination, admission, management, supervision, instruction, treatment, or release of a defendant, unless they are grossly negligent.

    Amends GS 15A-1002 (determination of capacity to proceed) so that the court must ensure a record of the determination is transmitted to the National Instant Criminal Background Check System if it finds that the defendant is incapable of proceeding. Makes conforming changes. Sets forth requirements for reports on capacity submitted so that it must include the examiner's opinion whether the defendant is capable or incapable to proceed with all relevant observations and findings. Requires the examiner to report on five listed matters if they determine that the defendant is not capable to proceed. Specifies that if the examiner is unable to provide any of the required opinions, recommendations, or findings, the reasons must be clearly stated in the report. Provides for remote video examinations, as described.

    Makes the following changes to GS 15A-1003 so that it sets forth a procedure upon finding that a defendant is incapable to proceed (was, referral of incapable defendant for civil commitment proceedings). Clarifies that a defendant incapable to proceed who is accused of committing a violent crime as described can only be taken to a 24-hour facility as space is available (currently, no mention of available space). Removes provisions for court order if defendant is not subject to involuntary commitment. If the court has found that the defendant is incapable of proceeding but likely to regain that capacity, requires the court to order the defendant to participate in a capacity restoration program, subject to five listed conditions, including duration of enrollment and location of program. Allows the court to waive the capacity restoration requirement if no capacity restoration program is reasonably available to the defendant, or if the court finds that the defendant is expected to gain capacity in the foreseeable future without the need for capacity restoration services, or for other good cause shown. If the court finds that the defendant is not reasonably likely to gain capacity to proceed in the foreseeable future, specifies that the court cannot order the defendant to receive capacity restoration services but instead must consider whether dismissal of the charges is required. Allows for supplemental hearings on this issue. Authorizes the court to determine if a defendant has a mental illness and is either a danger to self or others or in need of treatment in order to prevent further disability or deterioration that would predictably result in dangerousness and therefore meets the criteria for involuntary civil commitment. Allows for a custody order based on those findings. Provides that proceedings thereafter are subject to Part 7 of Article 5 of GS Chapter 122C, subject to the six listed conditions.   

    Removes provisions of GS 15A-1004 (orders for safeguarding of defendant and return for trial) and replaces the statutory content with content pertaining to the examination and reports required for a defendant lacking capacity, as follows. Requires the clerk to obtain reports every sixty days on a defendant’s progress in a capacity restoration program, as described, including a separate report if the defendant is not a suitable candidate for capacity restoration services, requires capacity restoration in a different setting, or poses an unnecessary risk of danger to program personnel. When a defendant is found incapable to proceed and is placed in the custody or care of a hospital, institution or provider through a proceeding for involuntary civil commitment, requires the court’s orders to contain four listed requirements, including reports to the clerk of any expected discharge from commitment. When a defendant found incapable to proceed is placed in the secure custody of a designated person or organization as a condition of release, directs the court to require the supervising person or organization to report to the clerk immediately if it appears that the defendant has gained capacity to proceed. The court may also require a periodic report to the clerk from the supervising person or organization as to the condition of the defendant and the defendant's likelihood of gaining capacity to proceed, to the extent the person or organization is qualified to do so.

    Removes the text of GS 15A-1006 (return of defendant for trial upon gaining capacity) and replaces that text with provisions pertaining to the return of defendant for supplemental hearing and trial upon gaining capacity; discharge and return of defendant from involuntary commitment, as follows. Requires the clerk to provide written notice to the district attorney and the defendant’s attorney within 72 hours of receiving notice that a defendant has likely gained capacity to proceed to trial. Provides for further written notice to the sheriff, as described, if the defendant is accused of committing a violent crime and regains capacity to proceed. Sets out requirements for supplemental hearings and trial. 

    Removes the prior content thereof, and makes the following changes to GS 15A-1007 (supplemental capacity hearings). Requires the district attorney to calendar the matter for a hearing within 30 days of receiving notice that the defendant has regained capacity to proceed. Allows for supplemental hearings on capacity. Requires the case to be calendared for trial as soon as possible. Specifies that continuances beyond sixty days of the calendared trial date should only be granted in extraordinary circumstances, as specified. Allows for further capacity restoration services to be ordered if reasonably available as specified. Requires the court to hold a supplemental capacity hearing if any of the following four events occur:

    1. When the defendant has been ordered to participate in a capacity restoration program and the program has not reported to the clerk that the defendant has gained capacity to proceed prior to the end of the defendant's enrollment period.
    2. Every four months if the court has previously waived the requirement for capacity restoration services.
    3. Every four months if the defendant has been found not likely to gain capacity within the foreseeable future and the charges have not already been disposed.
    4. When it appears to the court that any of the conditions for disposition have been met.

    Allows for the court to hold supplemental hearings on motion or of its own accord. Permits the court to take any action at supplemental hearing that it could have taken at the original hearing, including the three specified.

    Provides for a referral for civil commitment proceedings in GS 15A-1008 upon motion by the district attorney prior to dismissal of criminal charges and a court order containing the required findings. Authorized temporary detention of the defendant.

    Enacts new GS 15A-1010, providing as follows. Prohibits compelling a defendant found incapable to proceed to trial from taking medication to gain or maintain capacity. Allows the court to order, however, compelled medication of an uncooperative defendant to gain or maintain capacity to proceed, upon either the State or court’s motion, if the court finds by clear and convincing evidence all of the following based on circumstances presented that are specific to the defendant in question: (1) the defendant is charged with a serious offense against the person or property, and there are no apparent special circumstances lessening the importance of the government’s interest in bringing the defendant to trial, (2) the proposed treatment is reasonable and appropriate for the defendant’s mental health condition and its proposed use is consistent with accepted medical standards, (3) the proposed treatment will not cause an unnecessary risk to the defendant’s physical or mental health, (4) the proposed treatment is necessary insofar as it is substantially likely to render the defendant competent for trial, and less intrusive means would not further this interest, and (5) the proposed treatment is substantially unlikely to have side effects that undermine the fairness of the defendant's trial. Requires a licensed medical profession to supervise the administration of any ordered treatment, but the course of treatment must be reviewed and authorized by the court and the court may impose any other conditions necessary to protect the defendant’s rights to ensure the safety of others. Allows the order to provide multiple alternative courses of treatment in the medical professional’s discretion. Allows the court to amend previous compelled medication orders upon motion of the district attorney, defendant’s attorney, the court’s own motion, or upon notice by the treatment provider that a change in the course of treatment is warranted. Specifies that the statue does not preclude medical treatment of person involuntarily committed. Subjects treatment ordered under the statute to the immunity provisions in GS 15A-1001(e).

    Amends GS 122C-54 by amending what must be included in a report by a facility who conducted a court-ordered mental exam of a defendant in a criminal case, so that it must contain all of the matters listed in new GS 15A-1002(b3).

    Amends GS 122C-256 by adding and defining the term IBCRP (inpatient-based capacity restoration program). Specifies that IBCRPs are offered by inpatient psychiatric facilities with expertise to provide capacity restoration programming; and requires that the programs be available within the state psychiatric hospital system. Specifies that inpatient treatment is intended for defendants that are likely to benefit from inpatient level of care but who may or not meet involuntary commitment criteria.

    Requires DHHS to adopt guidelines by December 1, 2026, for treatment of individuals who are referred under GS 15A-1003 to a detention center capacity restoration program, community-based capacity restoration program, or inpatient based capacity restoration program, incorporating best practices to restore the individual’s capacity to proceed to trial in criminal court. Requires the guidelines to be published on DHHS’s website.

    Amends GS 122C-273 by adding that the administration of medication under a court order for a criminal defendant found incapable to proceed to trial is governed by GS 15A-1010.

    Applies to any initial or supplemental capacity hearings conducted on or after December 1, 2026.

    Section 14.

    Amends Section 1(j) of SL 2025-93 by delaying the effective date of GS 15A-533(b1) (which provided that if a defendant is (1) charged with a violent offense and the judicial official determines that the defendant has previously been subject to an order of involuntary commitment within the prior three years, or (2) charged with any offense and the judicial official has reasonable grounds to believe the defendant is a danger to themselves or others, then the judicial official must set conditions of pretrial release in accordance with the Article and issue an order that includes specified requirements on examination and commitment) from December 1, 2026, to July 1, 2028. Also amends Section 9.5(b) by delaying the effective date of changes to GS 122C-266, inpatient commitment; second examination and treatment pending hearing, from December 1, 2027, to July 1, 2028.


  • Summary date: Jun 17 2026 - View Summary

    Senate committee substitute to the 2nd edition makes the following changes.

    Removes Section 11 of the act, which required the University of North Carolina Health Care System to explore the feasibility of improving the provision of services at Broughton Hospital, Central Regional Hospital, and Cherry Hospital. Makes conforming organizational changes.


  • Summary date: Jun 2 2026 - View Summary

    House committee substitute to the 1st edition makes the following changes.

    Adds whereas clauses.

    Amends what must be include in the report on the study on relevant statues, judicial and clinical practices, and available technological resources to identify areas of systemic improvement in the State’s involuntary commitment (IVC) process as follows: (1) no longer includes establishing a foundation for more effective legal and clinical outcomes for the specified items; (2) adds any necessary statutory changes to increase data sharing between the Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) and the eCourts system on IVC exams and court proceedings; and (3) adds the feasibility and potential benefits of giving law enforcement access to IVC court records to better inform law enforcement procedures and operations.

    Adds the following new content.

    Section 2

    Requires DHHS and the North Carolina Sheriff’s Association to develop a plan for using telehealth to complete the first examinations of individuals in county jails. Requires that the plan include at least the five listed components, including: (1) a recommended model for jail-based telehealth services; (2) funding amount necessary to support providing telehealth services in all county jails; and (3) a timeline for the statewide implementation of the telehealth service plan. Requires a report on the plan to the specified NCGA committee and division by October 1, 2026.

    Section 3

    Requires the Local Management Entities/Managed Care Organizations (LME/MCOs) and DHHS to develop a plan for using mobile crisis units to enhance efficiency of the IVC process. Requires that the plan include the four listed components, including: (1) developing a statewide coverage model using in-person clinicians or on-call licensed clinicians in mobile crisis units to complete the first exam for IVC; and (2) an analysis of funding needed to implement the plan. Requires a report on the plant to the specified NCGA committee and division by October 1, 2026.

    Section 4

    Requires DHHS to evaluate the standard training program for IVC examiners for necessary improvements and to incorporate additional training into the standardized training program for providers conducing first exams of individuals in county jails. Requires a report to the specified NCGA committee and division by December 1, 2026.

    Section 5

    Requires DHHS to develop a plan to address: (1) the ongoing shortage of staffed and available behavioral health beds in State-Operated Facilities for individuals in crisis, (2) the staffing deficiencies that limit the use of existing behavioral health bed capacity, (3) potential use of non-state-operated entities or facilities to provide staffing for or leasing to state-operated facilities, and (4) contracting for behavioral health beds or staffing as supplementary or alternative to state-operated or staffed beds. Requires that the plan include the five listed components, including: (1) evaluation of current staffing models, hiring and recruitment practices, employee retention strategies, and the use of incentive pools; (2) any grant opportunities and other funding mechanisms to support behavioral health bed capacity; and (3) an assessment of opportunities to utilize non-governmental facilities or entities. Requires a report to the specified NCGA committee and division by December 1, 2026.

    Section 6

    Requires the North Carolina Collaboratory (Collaboratory) to study how outpatient commitment may be more effectively used and implemented. Requires the study to include the four listed components including: (1) an examination of barriers that limit the use or effectiveness of outpatient commitment, including the availability of outpatient commitment services statewide; and (2) an assessment of mechanisms currently available to track adherence and monitor compliance, along with proposed methods to strengthen and enhance tracking and monitoring processes. Requires a report to the specified NCGA committee by December 1, 2026.

    Section 7

    Requires DHHS to consult with the Sheriffs' Association in providing law enforcement access to BH SCAN. Requires a report to the specified NCGA committee when the access is complete. Effective August 1, 2026.

    Requires DHHS to (1) develop and implement real-time data availability within BH SCAN, (2) ensure that BH SCAN provides timely, accurate, and continuously updated information on available behavioral health beds to authorized users, and (3) develop and implement functionality within BH SCAN that allows authorized users to reserve an available behavioral health bed in real time. Effective August 1, 2027.

    Section 8

    Requires the Collaboratory to study the differing legal standards governing IVC and incapacity to proceed to identify statutory revisions that would enhance each system's effectiveness and advance public safety. Requires the study to include recommendations for statutory changes to address inconsistent terminology and clarify procedures for the transition of individuals between systems. Requires a report on the study to the specified NCGA committee by December 1, 2026.

    Section 9

    Requires DHHS to create a working group of representatives from the Administrative Office of the Courts (AOC), and other stakeholders, to examine the systemic factors contributing to the "revolving door" pattern where individuals cycle repeatedly through arrest, detention, or IVC, to then be released back into the community without sustained stabilization or support. Sets out the purpose of the group as identifying gaps, evaluating current practices, and recommending strategies to interrupt repeated crises and reduce avoidable recidivism. Requires quarterly reports, beginning January 1, 2027, on the working group’s findings and recommendations to the specified NCGA committee and division.

    Section 10

    Requires the Department of Adult Correction (DAC) and the North Carolina Sheriffs' Association to study providing medical and behavioral health care in county jails and make recommendations to improve the healthcare provided to individuals in custody. Requires the study to include the six listed components, including: (1) a review of intake screening procedures used in county jails for identifying medical and behavioral health conditions; (2) an examination of current health care provider arrangements, including in-house services, contracted services, hybrid models, or other recommended approaches for delivering care in county jails; and (3) an evaluation of existing staffing models for medical and behavioral health services in county jails. Requires a report on the study to the specified NGA committee and division by December 1, 2026.

    Section 11

    Require the UNC Health Care System (UNC Health) to explore the feasibility of improving services at Broughton Hospital, Central Regional Hospital, and Cherry Hospital (collectively, the Hospitals). Requires studying and making recommendations on the six listed topics, including: (1) feasibility of transferring full or just certain operation of the Hospitals from DHHS to UNC Health; (2) any services UNC Health could provide to DHHS to assist in providing services at the Hospitals; and (3) any financial impact, impact on patient outcomes, and any improvement in staffing, that would result from implementing the recommendations provided according to this section. Requires a report on the plan to the specified NCGA committee and division by December 1, 2026.

    Section 12

    Requires the Collaboratory to explore improving services to those same Hospitals. Requires studying and making recommendations on the six specified topics, including: (1) the feasibility of transferring full or certain operation of the Hospitals from DHHS to another entity; (2) any services that another entity could provide to DHHS to assist in providing services at the Hospitals; and (3) any financial impact, impact on patient outcomes, and any improvement in staffing to result from implementing the recommendations provided according to this section. Requires a report on the study to the specified NCGA committee and division by December 1, 2026.

    Section 13

    Amends GS 122C-261 (concerning affidavit and petition before clerk or magistrate when immediate hospitalization of a person with a mental illness is not necessary) by replacing references to outpatient treatment physician or center with outpatient treatment provider.

    Amends GS 122C-263(d)(1) by amending the determinations that must be made by a commitment examiner in order to recommend outpatient commitment, as follows. Now requires finding that the respondent be reasonably determined to be capable of surviving safely in the community, without posing a danger to others, when engaged in treatment for the respondent’s mental illness (was, respondent is capable of surviving safely in the community with available supervision from family, friends, or others). Adds upon the findings that must be made that the respondent has a history of declining or nonadherence to prescribed treatment by a licensed treatment provider, which may be evidenced by one or more of the following, occurring within the relevant past: (1) a prior conviction for a violent offense, (2) a violation of a civil protective order, (3) an incarceration for any offense, or (4) an involuntary inpatient psychiatric hospitalization. Also adds upon the findings that must be made that the respondent is scheduled to be discharged from an inpatient hospital setting or released from a county jail or state prison (allows an individual residing in a non-institutional setting that meets all of the other listed criteria to be subject to outpatient commitment within the court's discretion). Also amends the statute by replacing references to outpatient treatment physician or center with outpatient treatment provider.

    Amends GS 122C-265 by adding the requirement that the outpatient treatment provider examine the respondent and develop an initial outpatient treatment plan that must include at least the specific services to be provided (including medications), recommended frequency of participation in services, name of the provider who has agreed to provide service, arrangement made for initial contact with each service provider, and any other relevant information. Replaces references to outpatient treatment physician or center with outpatient treatment provider.

    Amends GS 122C-267 by requiring that the initial treatment plan that is now required under GS 122C-265 be admitted into evidence at the outpatient commitment hearing, and that it be incorporated into the order. Requires that the order include the outpatient treatment provider who is responsible for the care and treatment of the respondent as well as the LME/MCO, or an alternative determined by DHHS, that is responsible for the management and supervision of the respondent’s outpatient commitment (was, show the center or physician responsible for the management and supervision of the respondent’s outpatient commitment).

    Amends GS 122C-271 by amending the dispositions the court may make when a commitment examiner has recommended outpatient commitment and the respondent has been released pending the court hearing, as follows. Increases the allowable length of outpatient commitment the court may order when it finds by clear, cogent, and convincing evidence that the respondent meets the criteria in GS 122C-263(d)(1), so that it may not exceed 180 (was, 90) days; also amends this provision by adding what must be included in the order to include incorporating the initial treatment plan, stating that the respondent must comply with the treatment plan (including subsequent updates to the plan), and instructions to the responsible outpatient treatment provider and the LME/MCO, or alternative, regarding their monitoring and supervision duties. Amends the findings of facts that must be made before ordering outpatient commitment to include findings of fact on the availability and consent to accept the respondent as a client by all providers of the services listed in the initial treatment plan. Makes those same changes to the dispositions the court may make when the respondent has been held in a 24-hour facility pending the court hearing. Replaces references to outpatient treatment physician or center with outpatient treatment provider. Makes additional conforming and clarifying changes.

    Amends GS 122C-273 as follows. Allows an outpatient treatment provider to prescribe or administer (was, the outpatient treatment physician may prescribe or administer and the center may administer) reasonable and appropriate medication and treatment. Now requires that when a respondent does not comply or clearly refuses to comply with the treatment plan, that the treatment provider report their efforts to get the respondent to comply, to the LME/MCO that is responsible for monitoring and supervising the respondent’s outpatient commitment, and the LME/MCO must then report to the court with a request for a supplemental hearing (previously the LME/MCO was not involved). Adds the requirement that the LME/MCO keep a list of all individuals on outpatient commitment and ensure the individual's care manager is aware of the treatment plan; requires that DHHS have access to the list and that it treat this information as privileged and confidential. Allows, the LME/MCO responsible for the respondent’s monitoring and supervisions, as an alternative to the outpatient treatment provider, to requires the court to order the respondent be taken into custody for an exam when they fail to comply but do not clearly refuse to comply with the treatment, after reasonably effort to solicit the respondent’s compliance. Requires that the LME/MCO (was, the outpatient treatment physician or center) request the calendaring of a supplemental hearing when a respondent on outpatient commitment intends to move or moves to another county. Adds the LME/MCO to the entities that may notify the court when a respondent moves to another state or to an unknown location. Replaces references to outpatient treatment physician or center with outpatient treatment provider.

    Amends GS 122C-274 as following. Amends the actions that the court may take when it determining that the respondent has failed or refused to comply, to include issuing an order for inpatient commitment upon finding by clear, cogent, and convincing evidence that there is a nexus between the respondent's past conduct and the reasonable probability of the respondent's future dangerousness to self or others. Specifies that a finding of noncompliance with an outpatient commitment order under this statute creates a rebuttable presumption that there is a nexus between the respondent's past conduct and the reasonable probability of the respondent's future dangerousness to self or others. Requires that an order directing continuation of outpatient treatment under new supervision be provided to the LME/MCO. Expands the cap of the allowable term of outpatient commitment from 90 to 180 days when the court finds the respondent meets the criterial for outpatient commitment. Replaces references to outpatient treatment physician or center with outpatient treatment provider. Makes additional clarifying and conforming changes.

    Amends GS 122C-275 to require that a copy of discharge order when the court finds that the respondent no longer meets the criteria of GS 122C-263(d)(1) be given to the LME/MCO. Requires that the court comply with GS 122C-271 (disposition). Replaces references to outpatient treatment physician or center with outpatient treatment provider.

    Amends GS 122C-276 to require that the court comply with GS 122C-271 (disposition). Makes additional clarifying changes.

    Amends GS 122C-54(d) by adding that the DHHS must be given access to all relevant data, court orders, records, or other relevant information, including any confidential information, related to its duties and responsibilities under Article 5 (Procedure for Admission and Discharge of Clients) of GS Chapter 122C. Requires that DHHS keep all information collected under this subsection privileged and confidential.

    Applies to proceedings that occur on or after December 1, 2026.

    Section 14

    Amends GS 90-414.4 to require that patient records protected by 42 CFR §2 be disclosed through the HIE Network when the North Carolina Health Information Exchange Authority has provided written notice to participating entities that the protected data can be disclosed consistent with HIE’s statutory authority. Makes conforming changes.

    Amends GS 90-414.8 by expanding on the membership of the North Carolina Health Information Exchange Advisory Board by including the Deputy Secretary for the State’s Medicaid program, or their designee, as an ex officio, voting member.

    Makes conforming changes to the act’s titles.


  • Summary date: Apr 29 2026 - View Summary

    Requires the Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS), Department of Information Technology (DIT), and the Administrative Office of the Courts (AOC) to study statutes, judicial and clinical practices, and technological resources to find areas for improvement in the state’s involuntary commitment (IVC) process. Requires that the study identify existing gaps in the current process and provide recommendations to address or eliminate the gaps and ensure that individuals subject to IVC get timely, data-driven, and accessible support. Requires a report by February 1, 2027, to the specified committee, which must include: (1) a comprehensive evaluation of the legal and operational frameworks governing IVC in the state to provide formal recommendations for systematic improvements, with the evaluation focusing on ensuring that judicial officers get timely clinical data, and on establishing a foundation for more effective legal and clinical outcomes including the four listed, including collaborating with the UNC School of Government; and (2) any additional information deemed relevant to ensure high-quality data collection and data-driven decision making across the IVC system.