SPORT SHOOTING RANGE PROTECTION.

Printer-friendly: Click to view
View NCGA Bill Details(link is external)2011-2012 Session
Senate Bill 560 (Public) Filed Monday, April 11, 2011
TO PROVIDE THAT A SPORT SHOOTING RANGE THAT RELOCATES DUE TO CERTAIN CIRCUMSTANCES IS STILL CONSIDERED TO BE CONTINUOUSLY IN EXISTENCE SINCE BEGINNING OPERATION AND NOT TO HAVE UNDERGONE A SUBSTANTIAL CHANGE IN USE.
Intro. by Brock.
Status: Ref To Com On Agriculture (House Action) (May 26 2011)

Bill History:

S 560

Bill Summaries:

  • Bill S 560 (2011-2012)
    Summary date: May 23 2011 - View Summary

    Senate committee substitute makes the following changes to 1st edition.
    Amends proposed GS 14-409.46, clarifying that a sport shooting range that relocates to another location within the same county due to condemnation, rezoning, annexation, road construction, or development is considered to be continuously in existence and not to have undergone a substantial change in use. Adds that a sport shooting range exempted from liability under Article 53C of GS Chapter 14 that relocates to a new location in a different county must comply with ordinances in effect at the new location as of the date property is purchased to establish the range.

    Criminal Justice, Land Use, Planning and Zoning
  • Bill S 560 (2011-2012)
    Summary date: Apr 11 2011 - View Summary

    Amends GS 14-409.46, adding new subsection (f), as the title indicates. Provides that the applicable circumstances are relocating due to: (1) condemnation, (2) rezoning, (3) annexation, (4) road construction, or (5) development.

    Criminal Justice, Land Use, Planning and Zoning
    GS 14
View: All Summaries for Bill