Senate committee substitute makes the following changes to 1st edition.
Amends proposed GS 14-409.46, clarifying that a sport shooting range that relocates to another location within the same county due to condemnation, rezoning, annexation, road construction, or development is considered to be continuously in existence and not to have undergone a substantial change in use. Adds that a sport shooting range exempted from liability under Article 53C of GS Chapter 14 that relocates to a new location in a different county must comply with ordinances in effect at the new location as of the date property is purchased to establish the range.
SPORT SHOOTING RANGE PROTECTION.
Printer-friendly: Click to view
View NCGA Bill Details | 2011-2012 Session |
TO PROVIDE THAT A SPORT SHOOTING RANGE THAT RELOCATES DUE TO CERTAIN CIRCUMSTANCES IS STILL CONSIDERED TO BE CONTINUOUSLY IN EXISTENCE SINCE BEGINNING OPERATION AND NOT TO HAVE UNDERGONE A SUBSTANTIAL CHANGE IN USE.Intro. by Brock.
Status: Ref To Com On Agriculture (House Action) (May 26 2011)
Bill History:
-
Mon, 11 Apr 2011 Senate: Filed
-
Tue, 12 Apr 2011 Senate: Passed 1st Reading
-
Tue, 12 Apr 2011 Senate: Ref To Com On State and Local Government
-
Tue, 19 Apr 2011 Senate: Reptd Fav
-
Tue, 19 Apr 2011 Senate: Re-ref Com On Judiciary II
-
Mon, 23 May 2011 Senate: Reptd Fav Com Substitute
-
Mon, 23 May 2011 Senate: Com Substitute Adopted
-
Tue, 24 May 2011 Senate: Passed 2nd & 3rd Reading
-
Thu, 26 May 2011 House: Passed 1st Reading
-
Thu, 26 May 2011 House: Ref To Com On Agriculture
S 560
Bill Summaries:
-
Bill S 560 (2011-2012)Summary date: May 23 2011 - View Summary
-
Bill S 560 (2011-2012)Summary date: Apr 11 2011 - View Summary
Amends GS 14-409.46, adding new subsection (f), as the title indicates. Provides that the applicable circumstances are relocating due to: (1) condemnation, (2) rezoning, (3) annexation, (4) road construction, or (5) development.
View: All Summaries for Bill