REQUIRE SURETY OPTIONS FOR DEVELOPERS.

Printer-friendly: Click to view
View NCGA Bill Details2011-2012 Session
House Bill 827 (Public) Filed Wednesday, April 6, 2011
RELATING TO THE FINANCIAL ASSURANCES SPECIFIED BY LOCAL GOVERNMENTS AS PERFORMANCE GUARANTEES UNDER SUBDIVISION CONTROL ORDINANCES.
Intro. by Collins.

Status: Ref To Com On Commerce and Job Development (House Action) (Apr 7 2011)

Bill History:

H 827

Bill Summaries:

  • Summary date: Apr 8 2011 - View Summary

    Under current law, GS 153A-331(c) (counties) and GS 160A-372(c) (cities), a local government may adopt a subdivision control ordinance and require developers to provide performance guarantees. If the ordinance requires a performance guarantee, the local government must provide a range of options for the guarantee and the developer has the option of choosing the type of guarantee to provide. Amendments to those two sections provide that if the local government’s range of performance guarantee options includes a letter of credit, the developer may choose to obtain a surety bond in lieu of the letter of credit. Provides that while the local government is authorized to establish reasonable requirements governing the surety, certain sureties (those listed annually as acceptable on federal bonds) are deemed acceptable. Applies to any range of performance guarantee options specified by a local government on or after the date when this act becomes law.