AN ACT TO PROVIDE THAT WHEN CITIES AND COUNTIES ACT OUTSIDE OF THE SCOPE OF THEIR AUTHORITY, THE PARTY SUCCESSFULLY CHALLENGING THAT ACTION MAY RECOVER REASONABLE ATTORNEYS' FEES. Summarized in Daily Bulletin 4/6/11, 5/23/11, 5/24/11, and 6/15/11. Enacted June 24, 2011. Effective October 1, 2011.
ATTY FEES/CITY OR COUNTY ACTION OUTSIDE AUTH. (NEW).
Printer-friendly: Click to view
View NCGA Bill Details | 2011-2012 Session |
TO PROVIDE THAT WHEN CITIES AND COUNTIES ENACT ORDINANCES OR TAKE ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIONS FOR WHICH THERE IS NO STATUTORY AUTHORITY, AND THE ORDINANCE OR ACTION IS AN ABUSE OF AUTHORITY, THE PLAINTIFF MAY RECOVER ATTORNEY FEES.Intro. by Brawley, Moffitt, LaRoque, Brubaker.
Bill History:
-
Tue, 5 Apr 2011 House: Filed
-
Thu, 7 Apr 2011 House: Passed 1st Reading
-
Thu, 7 Apr 2011 House: Ref To Com On Government
-
Wed, 4 May 2011 House: Withdrawn From Com
-
Wed, 4 May 2011 House: Re-ref Com On Judiciary Subcommittee A
-
Mon, 23 May 2011 House: Reptd Fav Com Substitute
-
Mon, 23 May 2011 House: Cal Pursuant Rule 36(b)
-
Mon, 23 May 2011 House: Placed On Cal For 5/24/2011
-
Tue, 24 May 2011 House: Amend Adopted 1
-
Tue, 24 May 2011 House: Passed 2nd Reading
-
Wed, 25 May 2011 House: Passed 3rd Reading
-
Wed, 25 May 2011 House: Ordered Engrossed
-
Thu, 26 May 2011 Senate: Rec From House
-
Tue, 31 May 2011 Senate: Passed 1st Reading
-
Tue, 31 May 2011 Senate: Ref To Com On Judiciary I
-
Tue, 14 Jun 2011 Senate: Withdrawn From Com
-
Tue, 14 Jun 2011 Senate: Re-ref Com On Rules and Operations of the Senate
-
Wed, 15 Jun 2011 Senate: Reptd Fav Com Substitute
-
Wed, 15 Jun 2011 Senate: Com Substitute Adopted
-
Wed, 15 Jun 2011 Senate: Placed On Cal For 6/15/2011
-
Wed, 15 Jun 2011 Senate: Passed 2nd & 3rd Reading
-
Wed, 15 Jun 2011 House: Rec To Concur S Com Sub
-
Wed, 15 Jun 2011 House: Cal Pursuant Rule 36(b)
-
Wed, 15 Jun 2011 House: Placed On Cal For 6/16/2011
-
Thu, 16 Jun 2011 House: Concurred In S/Com Sub
-
Thu, 16 Jun 2011 Ratified
-
Fri, 17 Jun 2011 Pres. To Gov. 6/17/2011
-
Fri, 24 Jun 2011 Signed By Gov. 6/24/2011
-
Fri, 24 Jun 2011 Ch. SL 2011-299
Bill Summaries:
-
Summary date: Jun 30 2011 - View Summary
-
Bill H 687 (2011-2012)Summary date: Jun 15 2011 - View Summary
Senate committee substitute makes the following changes to 3rd edition. Changes the effective date of the act to October 1, 2011 (previously effective when became law), and applies to claims for relief which are brought or defended on or after that date.
-
Bill H 687 (2011-2012)Summary date: May 24 2011 - View Summary
House amendment makes the following changes to 2nd edition.
Amends proposed GS 6-21.6, clarifying that the court may award reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs to a successful party, provided that if the court also finds that the city’s or county’s action was an abuse of discretion, then the court must award attorneys’ fees and costs.
-
Bill H 687 (2011-2012)Summary date: May 23 2011 - View Summary
House committee substitute makes the following changes to 1st edition. Deletes proposed GS 1-539.17 added to GS Chapter 1, Article 43C, and instead adds new GS 6-21.6 to GS Chapter 6, Article 3. Provides that in an action (was, in any civil action) in which a city or county is a party (was, a defendant), the court may award reasonable attorney’s fees if the court finds that the city or county acted outside the scope of its legal authority (was, if the court finds that there was not statutory authority for any ordinance, resolution, or administrative action of the city or county and that the action of the city or county was an abuse of authority).
Changes the title to AN ACT TO PROVIDE THAT WHEN CITIES AND COUNTIES ACT OUTSIDE OF THE SCOPE OF THEIR AUTHORITY, THE PARTY SUCCESSFULLY CHALLENGING THAT ACTION MAY RECOVER REASONABLE ATTORNEY’S FEES.
Applies to claims for relief that are brought or defended on or after the date the act becomes law.
-
Bill H 687 (2011-2012)Summary date: Apr 6 2011 - View Summary
Enacts new GS 1-539.17 to allow a court, in an action against a city or a county, to award attorney fees against the defendant city or county if the court finds that there was not statutory authority for any ordinance, resolution, or administrative action of the city or county and that the action of the city or county was an abuse of authority.
Applies to causes of action arising on or after the date the act becomes law.